if there's more to the domain context, i'd call it rename(~). i think from the outside, it's better to articulate what you want in domain semantics, rather than implementation semantics.
i think from the outside, it's better to articulate what you want in domain semantics, rather than implementation semantics.
You've articulated here what I've actually been trying to communicate. I have no problem if a method does nothing but get/set a variable. I just think they should be named with domain semantics.
if there's more to the domain context, i'd call it rename(~). i think from the outside, it's better to articulate what you want in domain semantics, rather than implementation semantics.