I would say equality vote is very important it was missing in this country not long ago. I would say that demonstrates an unyielding vein in this country that seems to be against equality. However, equality was achieved without violence. Why is violence required for your argument?
>I would say equality vote is very important it was missing in this country not long ago.
If you mean equality of vote; it's just another version of equality of chance. Everyone gets a chance to vote and be voted for, the outcome may not be equality.
The other option is equality of outcome, which is antithetical to equality of vote.
>Why is violence required for your argument?
It's not. I recognize that sometimes violence is an inevitable outcome but everyone should be looking for non-violent means that make the least amount of people unhappy.
I don't think I ever made violence necessary for my argument tbh...
