Seeing the demo video on your website, I really have no idea what's going on. Your navigation doesn't have to be "revolutionary", it has to work. If no one has done it before, maybe there's a good reason for that.
The interface features bad contrasts (neon colors on white), thin (illegible) fonts, and too much whitespace. The category/navigation bars seem way too small. Please work on your typography.
Further design themes are planned. For now the low contrast is by design. When you enter your projects they will be displayed in high contrast.
Thanks for the feedback though
I get that the low contrast is by design. Everything is by design, since someone once thought about everything. I don't want to be a dick about it, but texts with low contrast are almost never a good idea.
I agree on the thin fonts, but text with low contrast can sometimes be useful to indicate that an element is inactive or unused (e.g. <input disabled> in HTML).
I started to scroll while reading, this led to the situation that the white type on whyit lens flare made it impossible to read further. I stopped right there.
I closed the tab and thought "well, for an old crap like me, who didn't grow up with tablets but with pen and paper, this will always be to slow, so why bother if they can't even get thy typo right." And without the impulse sent by zichy's comment, I wouldn't have bothered to let you know either.
Low contrast is a poor 'design decision'. You instantly cut of a percentage of your potential market by that design, such as myself. I have an eye condition that makes focusing difficult and your low contrast design makes pieces of your website completely illegible to me.
It's cool. It's creative. It's different. Things that do not often top you're typical Hacker Newsie's values list, but - hey - if making software's a means to an end I never understood why anyone would write code themselves anyways.
You created something, and that's rad. Yeah, if you're trying to sell out you're doing it wrong, but sometimes I wish I had marked up my soul a little higher back in the day.
It flickers and fails and stutters all over the place, but I'm in China, which tends to get a big ol' stick up in western people's "this will always load and will be pretty fast and reliable" wheel rather quickly.
I can't figure out how to use it at all, but I want to.
No offense intended, but you may want to start with WCAG 1.4.6 as a baseline. It's entirely possible to create a modern, compelling UI in conformance to basic accessibility guidelines.
I can vouch for workflowy. I've tried many to-do apps before, but workflowy is simple enough that I can structure it however I like and never feel like I've missed something. Unfortunately, I don't know how to handle repetitive tasks like dusting every two days.
Workflowy is the only list maker that I've ever stuck with. Most of them are so over-designed. I don't need videos and voice reminders and all kinds of nonsense; just compact, structurable lists.
I really like Dynalist.io I've been a user for about 6 months now. The mobile experience is surprisingly very good as well. Also their team is very transparent and responsive about their bugs and features (requests and planned). Finally they made it as an evolution to workflowy, which I find they've succeeded at.
This seems like an interesting approach to organize data. Are there any open source implementation that I can customize myself and host on my own personal server?
I have a self-hosted solution. It's in an alpha state, not ready for public consumption, but would love any feedback from people willing to try it out. Here it is:
I just tried dynalist.io and it is really nice.
I use Todoist everyday because of its simplicity and ease-of-use especially when making sub-lists. I didn't stick with Workflowy because it was too simple. But looking at dynlist.io, it might be what I've been looking for, with the right balance between simplicity and practicality.
Anybody care to enlighten me what this does other than being a simple outliner? I tried to find out, but, why not just use an outliner? What am I missing?
It IS an outliner. I tried using outliners back 10 years ago and became frustrated with options available. There were no good online outliners and the best desktop outliner, OmniOutliner, is only available for Mac. I tried a bunch on Windows but they were really buggy or didn't meet my needs. Then Workflowy came out and just worked.
we built this web app which enables you to structure ideas, thoughts and your projects.
It offers a similar flexibility in building hierarchy as OmniFocus. Just without being tied to apple or a missing web interface.
One of the main reasons why we started this project.
I want to highlight one feature that I never seen anywhere else. There is no difference between tasks, projects or folders. It works based on your hierarchy, for example an idea become a project when you add a "subtask". The app has no limit on how deep you nest and offers an extra view that filter all actionable next steps out of your hierarchy.
It is a progressive web app, so you are able to add it to your mobile homescreen and use it offline. You can also encrypt your data with your login password.
I am excited to get your thoughts about the app or any questions.
I was interested until I read "revolutionary design" while having a hard time to read most of the copy of the site. There are some other major design issues on the site that you might wanna get fixed. I'm not a design geek, but text has to be readable.
TBH, i'm also confused, but i didnt invest more than 2 minutes looking at it. The menu changes the location to all sides which is a bit confusing. I also added some drop's, gave it a context, now they are gone?
It seems that the application is trying to help a lot, with video and the help pages etc. Which is good, but also a sign that its not very intuitive.
Just FYI - Momentum is a well established email platform that's owned by MessageSystems. If your project gets any traction, this is sure to cause issues at some point.
Please just let people try it. No signup flow, no barriers. Just let us use it. If it's as good as you say, we'll want to save what we've created; you can get us to sign up then.
Also, you should really user-test landing pages like this. I get that you love the design and content. But the page is not for you. Book 5 people in your target market and study how it works for them. Then revise and book another 5. Repeat until people are actually engaging with the topic in the way you want.
I agree with you, our long-term goal is to use the approach you mentioned. We even considered it for the launch but thought it is to much work.
But I realized that it worth more to make it as easy as possible to try out a web app, if you ask for feedback.
So for the future and if possible I will do it differently.
Thanks for the feedback, for now we are pretty happy with the engagement of the landing page.
Still stuck waiting for my verification email, and it's not in spam. You should let people use your app as soon as they finish signing up.
Limit functionality or disable after a grace period to enforce email verification, don't stop people during the onboarding flow and lose their interest
The reception would be much improved with better visuals. I can't read anything, the launch page hurts my eyes and I don't know where to look. The gifs play too fast to understand what I'm looking at.
I love dash and was excited for this, but the navigation is madness. Someone let UX drive this one. Being surprised by the novelty is not a good UX experience.
in the event of an introduction of basic income, there will be for sure a free tier, maybe free at all :)
But in the long-term we need to sustain the infrastructure costs.
That depends on the feedback of how users and the community is willing to contribute to the costs or the value they have from the app.
Great to hear, we still search for cases where the flexibility provided by the app is not sufficient
The value we see in the app navigation is the following:
The navigation is separated in three broader levels.
1. The first level is everything that is relevant in the moment (Inbox, Next, Away).
2. The second level is to organize everything Idea, Project or Archive. From time perspective mostly related to the next weeks.
3. And the third level is to review your hole system.
After a short time it will feel like walking through different rooms and levels in a building.
I love OmniFocus, but have always been bothered by a lack of web interface or Android client. (I use Focus GTD as an unofficial client on Android, and it's less than perfect at best.) I've been looking for something like this. Going to try it out and hopefully provide some insight.
i agree, this feature is on the roadmap, it is planned as an upgrade for the copy function from archive to active view. Instead of doing it manually for grocery list, you will be able to define a repetitive time frame
After reading the criticism here, I feel you might be in the wrong crowd. :)
I too do think though the transitions between different screens (i.e. clicking sides & top, bottom) should really have animated transitions to avoid disorientation. And I don't get why different screens go up or left or right or down in different situations. What's the relationship?
It's hard to understand what items can be moved from where to what other list. The behaviour seems random.
Thank you for your follow up question, it is on our roadmap to rework the navigation with animated transitions to make it more clear what is happening.
In this comment is some explanation about the meaning of levels. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15339086
It is like levels in a building (or reaching up to the of the mountain). You start with real practical stuff, like task you want to do this day, where it is clear what to do.
The "higher" you navigate in the app (or walk up in the building) the lists become more abstract. Projects, Decisions(No, Done), Ideas. For the future the are even more higher levels planned like goals. The highest level will be your visions, kind of "why"(golden circles stuff) for every item in the lower levels.
The more the lowest level is aligned with the highest level the better you feel. (Means doing stuff that brings you were you really want with your life, and not only daily stuff that keeps you just busy)
Because all the items in the different levels are connected, it would be possible to give you feedback about a small daily task and how it relates or moves you forward with your big visions.
We work to improve the understanding of movements of items between lists, here a first explanation:
I believe that if you understand the meaning(relates strongly to gtd) of every view, the movement of items follows by logic:
InView (List managed by user) - Capture everything without more work
IdeaView (List managed by user) - Stuff you want to do in the future, no next step known here
ActiveView (List managed by user) - Stuff you want to do next. For every project(more than one task) you have to define a next step or wait for somebody or defer to date xy.
ArchiveView (List managed by user) - Stuff you want be able to find again in the future or reuse
DoneView (Sink List) - things you have done
NoView (Sink List) - things you decided not to do
NextView (Auto filtered list) - all calculated nextsteps from activeView
AwayView (Auto filered list) - all items you marked as away from activeView
ReviewView (Auto filtered list) - all items from ideaView, activeView and archiveView that needs to be reviewed
2 examples:
From idea to active means you finally decided to tackle an idea and want to define what to do next. So moving make sense here.
From archive to active means you want to reuse for example a grocery list or a visit to known restaurant from your list. So copy make sense here.
Our goal is to make this complex relationships as intuitive as possible without the need for the user to understand everything. Lots of work to be done here :)
A metaphor I really like: Many people drive a bicycle everyday because it is faster than walking, but not everyone needs (and wants) to understand the physics behind a bicycle to use it.
This seems challenging for a non-native like me to understand. I sort of anticipated this would have been the idea, but it's still hard to see if that's what it actually means - it's hard to see if 'drop' is a noun or a verb. It would be easier if it had a context word like you give here, i.e. "idea, project or reference".
Anyway, it's an interesting UI idea, particularly the mouse-oriented sorting of items. I wish a middle ground between this and something like checkvist or dynalist could be found.
Subscriptioncost for a todo list? With this amount of functionality?
Nope sry.
Don't get me wrong, i like your idea. It looks simliar what i'm already doing on paper and was planing to write somehow. But i'm not subscribing to small features and i'm guessing that it is very cheap, for that i would not give you my credit card information or not that cheap and than i don't care anymore about it.
The interface features bad contrasts (neon colors on white), thin (illegible) fonts, and too much whitespace. The category/navigation bars seem way too small. Please work on your typography.