Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'd imagine it being more helpful to look at military spending and amounts of money big companies are hoarding (looking at you Apple) to see where the real issues lie.

As long as people are ok with their money going into a mystery box they have no control over, holding no one accountable, how can we have anything BUT inequality?

As long as companies are free to play tax games and suck money out of the economy and then hang on to it for as long as they feel like it - how can we have anything BUT a screwed up volatile economy?

People talk about redistributing money as if there's a million rich people wiping their butts with 100$ bills and if only we could teleport that money outta their toilets, into the hands of those in need, we'd solve something.

Real solutions to real problems come with infrastructure, accountability, transparency.

They start in the mind, then go out into the real world. As long as in your mind it's republican vs democrat, rich vs poor or some other childish false dichotomy, we'll be right where we are, heading for serious social unrest.




How would you tax Apple? Realistically basically all taxes on corporations simply result in added cost the consumer. You may think you're taxing Apple but you're really just taxing the consumer extra.

As long as all their competitors are subject to the same tax, the price simply rises. This is why Apple products cost much more in the EU. Of course, if it were cheaper for a company to be located somewhere where they would not be subject to that tax, then you're simply just motivating them to relocate.


Doesn’t Apple pay some of the highest tax rates?


It's not so much about tax rates and I haven't looked into it too deeply - although I'm sure the big companies hire the best accountants to use every loophole in existence.

I am referring to this: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/apples-cash-hoard-swells-to-...

Companies should not be allowed to simply hang on to 250 billion dollars.

Imagine what could be done in science, infrastructure, services etc if 10% of that money went towards those things.

There's a great Peter Thiel clip about this that sums it up very well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q26XIKtwXQ


> Conpanies should not be allowed to hang on to 250 billion dollars.

Why? They earned it. And have you seen how much Apple donates to charities? Bill Gates at one point had a net worth of over 100 billion dollars before donating a huge sum to charity. If 250 billion is too much, what is a good amount?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: