Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

(Relative) Clojure noob here: what stops someone from developing a similar library to honeysql, but instead of passing in vectors/maps, one created the data structure in a plain quoted form and passed it in?

e.g. the first example in the README could be turned into:

    (def sqlmap 
        '(where (= :f.a "baz") 
            (from :foo (select [:a :b: :c])))
I understand that hiccup syntax can be awesome, but it seems like Clojure loses a bit of the magic of LISP when everything has to be written in terms of vectors/maps - what's wrong with a plain ol' list?

I imagine I'm probably missing something obvious or important, since I've only dabbled in Clojure (and loved it!)




Nested lists are harder to perform lookups on than maps.

If I want to know what the "from" part of the SQL query is, with HoneySQL I can write:

    (:from query)
On the other hand, depending on your s-expression syntax, I'd either have to find the table name positionally, or by walking the tree.


That makes sense. Thanks for the reply!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: