Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It was a question (note the question mark)... I don't see the need for snark.

Anyway, for my purposes, this wouldn't work, since the executable is embedded in libraries that are meant to run anywhere without any configuration. But yeah I could see that being fine under other circumstances I guess.




No snark. Just puzzled. You can still just make it configurable. Or just pick a random port and communicate it with your child process.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: