With his article on the NYT, he has become one the principal actors and is contributing to make the drama bigger.

so how's that relevant to your comment? Does this change anything about there being multiple actors in this drama?

In the article:

> There are many actors in the whole Google/diversity drama, but I’d say the one who’s behaved the worst is the C.E.O., Sundar Pichai.

He is implicitly criticizing the whole drama thing. And when saying Pichai behaved worst, I understand he is saying Pichai was who contributed most to make the drama bigger.

I think Brooks is contributing a lot to make the drama bigger. That's my point.

So is your point that this journalist guy should just not write about it? That's his job. It's different from a CEO making a bad decision.

It's one thing to write about something, it's another thing to have a call for action.

No. I only have criticized the hypocrisy of the sentence I've quoted.