Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Wait so they didn't actually go back and see if the people they identified as depressed had a diagnosis of clinical depression?



What, you thought this was an actual scientific study?


Ok I went back and read more:

"Data collection was crowdsourced using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowdwork platform. Separate surveys were created for depressed and healthy individuals. In the depressed survey, participants were invited to complete a survey that involved passing a series of inclusion criteria, responding to a standardized clinical depression survey, answering questions related to demographics and history of depression, and sharing social media history. We used the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) questionnaire to screen participant depression levels [26]. CES-D assessment quality has been demonstrated as on-par with other depression inventories, including the Beck Depression Inventory and the Kellner Symptom Questionnaire [27, 28]. Healthy participants were screened to ensure no history of depression and active Instagram use. See Additional file 1 for actual survey text."

So it sounds like they found depressed and healthy subjects via MTurk and verified them using surveys. I guess that's slightly more rigorous than just "people on MTurk thought the person in this photo looks depressed"


It literally is a peer-reviewed scientific study. Middlebrow cynical dismissals are boring.


a peer-reviewed scientific study at the height of the replication crisis




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: