We use XFS for sparql.uniprot.org (basically columnar database with semantic graph) there we recently retested it by accident. We use 2*4 TB consumer SSD ,ok rich consumer ;) With XFS we have 10-13% faster linear write of one big file (1.3TB) and about 20% more reads serviced per minute than EXT4. EXT4 was selected by accident instead of XFS for 1 of the 2 otherwise equal machines when upgrading these with the new 4TB SSDs instead of 1TB ones which they had before.
In general I feel that the more you go into "enterprise" storage levels, the more XFS pulls ahead from the EXT family. i.e. laptops and small servers are not where the difference lies.
In general I feel that the more you go into "enterprise" storage levels, the more XFS pulls ahead from the EXT family. i.e. laptops and small servers are not where the difference lies.