This is not unexpected if u take into account behind all the code are still humans.
Everyone can share everything for free, safe and sound in a happy world.
Didn't happen ever in the "real world", won't happen here. It's idealistic bias.
I'm sure many things have been written on this, but this is essentially an issue rooted in human behaviour.
It always comes down to having a or multiple arbiter(s) to maintain a standard. The issue with this in these type off ecosystems is that it's simply too big and too dynamic unless devs and the curators are on common terms release wise.
By now you basically are threading being an organisation potentially elevating privileges with just a small portion off devs to realistically deal with the scale off things. In this centralized state it can swing the other way, mainting heavy arbiting and release standards (Apple for example), creating a potential more stable and secure but closed system.
Everyone can share everything for free, safe and sound in a happy world.
Didn't happen ever in the "real world", won't happen here. It's idealistic bias.
I'm sure many things have been written on this, but this is essentially an issue rooted in human behaviour.
It always comes down to having a or multiple arbiter(s) to maintain a standard. The issue with this in these type off ecosystems is that it's simply too big and too dynamic unless devs and the curators are on common terms release wise.
By now you basically are threading being an organisation potentially elevating privileges with just a small portion off devs to realistically deal with the scale off things. In this centralized state it can swing the other way, mainting heavy arbiting and release standards (Apple for example), creating a potential more stable and secure but closed system.