Normally i nod knowingly and say, "No one appreciates how hard image search really is." But in this case, both Bing and Yahoo do much better. Usually Bing image search is better than google image search, but not by this much.
iPad images are similarly scarce. I wonder what's up? Could google really be this ham-fisted? I find it hard to believe, given that textual searches are not similarly obscured.
iPad images are similarly scarce. I wonder what's up? Could google really be this ham-fisted? I find it hard to believe, given that textual searches are not similarly obscured.