And why is the entire second page quotes from Twitter about it, and the link to the "latest discussions about the outage" a Twitter search for "wikipedia"?
The media crisis befalls both Trans-Tasman nations. SBS did a segment on news broadcasts across NSW and found out most "breaking news" segments were recorded days in advance, and in one session where the announcer deliberately changes outfits. Viewers would wait for updates on bushfires and other similar regional crises and they would be "updated" on news about the flavor of the month, rapist footie player leaving a nightclub or doing shopping.
American media, however, is as efficient and fervent for their corporate sponsors as any militant death-squad. In America, the footie player's ethnic origin would be researched and the rape case made into a race-war, or the victim tied to a political party in some fringe manner.
It looks like the article has been edited. Originally it basically said "Wikipedia is down. Twitter told us. See..."
Figure they just left them in as filler when they did the update. Not to mention they get that all important page 2 click so they can show you some more ads :)
I think some articles lately are too "news" and not enough "hacker". There's very, very little information in this article, and Wikipedia being down for a little while isn't especially intellectually stimulating.
I was reading some item (on HN probably) about how they have a big one in Tampa, Florida, a small one in Amsterdam and are planning on building another big one in Virginia.
That said, the article mentioned a time when a failure in Amsterdam lead to a failure to fall over to Florida which took out the whole service for a good while.
I live in Tampa. We are the Lightning Capitol of North America {insert Wikipedia link here}. Right now is the rainy season here, and generous amounts of lightning. It's basically the monsoon season. So the power sucks here, and even if you have excellent generators, as Home Shopping Network does, the network connectivity is still bound by local limitations. Tampa is a terrible place to put a data center.
I think it's there for historical reasons, because Jimmy Wales used to live there, so his company was there, and now it's a significant project to move everything.
According to this, it looks like all the db servers are in the Tampa datacenter, with Amsterdam (and formerly Seoul) just having miscellaneous utility servers, backups, and a bunch of Squid proxies: http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/Server_roles
Looks like way too few servers in the Amsterdam cluster to fail over to anyway, even if they were set up for it: the Tampa datacenter has over 400 servers, versus Amsterdam's 44.
If you are building a startup, I seriously recommend starting out in two data centers, even if you just have a vps or two in one or both of them. While operating at crazy scale may or may not be a Maserati problem, it will pay dividends early for your code quality, and site stability.
