Incidentally, I experience this every time I put in or remove my contact lenses. Because they are in a different position than my eyeglass lenses, the refraction affects image distorsion such that for a few minutes afterwards (especially if I am outside looking at large distances) it's somewhat disorienting.
It's not obvious to me that the "risk" talked about in the article is real, though. It seems that what they talk about in the article is that strabismus is when your stereoscopic vision does not develop because one eye does not align properly to your viewpoint. This is fundamentally different from the fact that your 2 eyes have to align slightly differently when viewing 3D video compared to the normal world. If you have strabismus, 3D video just won't work. It seems like a stretch to say that because you have to shift your aim point, you will lose the ability to align your eyes properly completely. In fact (like barrkel hinted at, too) it seems like this would be practice, not detrimental.
But this is obviously only speculation on my part...
It's not obvious to me that the "risk" talked about in the article is real, though. It seems that what they talk about in the article is that strabismus is when your stereoscopic vision does not develop because one eye does not align properly to your viewpoint. This is fundamentally different from the fact that your 2 eyes have to align slightly differently when viewing 3D video compared to the normal world. If you have strabismus, 3D video just won't work. It seems like a stretch to say that because you have to shift your aim point, you will lose the ability to align your eyes properly completely. In fact (like barrkel hinted at, too) it seems like this would be practice, not detrimental.
But this is obviously only speculation on my part...