Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Maybe their agreement allows them to act as an "enforcement arm" of the agents?

I don't think the courts recognize such agreements as valid, as the demise of Righthaven showed.




I'm thinking more of a financial backing of the lawsuit, not as plaintiff. You know, being the Thiel for the agent's Hulk Hogan.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: