:) I think the original had the ah-good-they-are-concentrating-on-the-important-stuff vibe. Not necessarily a bad thing. Especially for a tech service.
I don't like the use the word "design" gets on the web.
I see this as mostly a re-arting.
The way I use and more importantly: read this page hasny
't really changed.
As a signed up user I click on the button that lets me log in.
The experience is a little bit more different for first time users.
I would prefer it if we called design design and art art. This distinction is important, not just pedantic. While working in groups or at my office discussions of design regularly get caught up in what should be the icing on the cake: the art.
Good (it looks very Web 2.0), but where are the motion-blurred pictures of people in three-piece suits and phone operators with headsets on waiting to chat with me? All I see is a concise, informative overview of the company and the services they provide.
In conclusion, no Digg.
(What is "BW"? Is that something to do with Facebook?)
Pros: Root, many distros, great support (was able to change slice size within hours, that may vary but it was fast). The web console, in case of ssh irregularity, is nice.
Cons: none yet, maybe there exist some but I've had no problems so far for about a year or so.
