Can you honestly say that, within some defined boundary, whether you think of it as geographic (some predominately low income community) or by product segment (local real estate markets for example), that the money supply hasn't increased after this policy?
Are there not now more dollars chasing the same goods?
I guess $15,000 at the bottom of the market would not tend to have huge localized effects on housing (I think people would be more inclined to move towards cheaper housing than to compete for scarce housing; the $15,000 eases pressure on moving to better paying jobs).
For goods like food, the supply is pretty freaking elastic.
Are there not now more dollars chasing the same goods?