Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In a hot war, a cyber attack wouldn't be the opener, not strong enough relative to the response it would draw.

It would be something more Pearl Harborish, like a nuke or EMP detonated in space over the US that fries our communication networks and power grid.

In which case, this proposed kill switch would be redundant.




You nailed it. I was going to mention the EMP stuff, but backed away.

A high altitude nuclear detonation above the continental US is the first strike protocol for any nation-state that would try to attack us. Even then, a lot of our military's core command and control infrastructure has been hardened to withstand such an EMP for decades--as it was known that a high altitude detonation over US soil was the Soviet's plan for a first strike...That is why Cuba was such a big deal. Still, the EMP would completely decimate every non-hardened electrical system.


Yeah, the military systems may be able to survive, but it could cause mass havoc among the 300 million civilians, so still a decent first strike.


decent is an understatement




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: