Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You seem to be reading way more into my comment than was intended.

I'm just saying it's not cheaper to ignore technical debt. It's actually a bug somewhere in the operational budget or business plan.

If the system should run for thirty years on without an OS upgrade, design and budget for that up front. I promise that no one considered that when they configured a Windows XP box and threw it in a lab somewhere. And, hey, maybe that's OK in the short run. But there was no budget or business plan to replace those systems down the line either.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: