Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You're not missing anything. This is an example of implementing the wrong solution better instead of implementing the right solution.

The right solution is as you state public transit, which is more space efficient at moving people than cars.




The sleds are pretty cool, so long as you're using them to move people instead of cars. But if they can bring the cost of boring down by a factor of 10, that in and of itself would be a game changer, regardless of what you use the tunnel for.


The right solution on earth, with its fancy pants atmosphere.


What about digging up 100 million tons of earth to get enough lithium to make a battery for your electric car which is powered by coal?

Fake environmentalist love Elon - no reason why they won't like this.


It's a wonder Teslas cost as little as they do when you consider each one requires "digging up 100 million tons of earth" just for the battery. Me, I can't even get 10 million tons dug for less than $100k!

Those darn fake environmentalists. They're right up there with the scotsmen of the "no true" variety.


Pick a poison gas, buying and operating an all-electric car generates less of it per mile than a gasoline car, even if your electricity is all-coal. It also enables even greater poison control by using renewable electricity sources.


How much carbon was created digging up all that earth? Was that earth also dug up with battery powered trucks? Transported on battery powered ships?

By the way, why does Singapore grade Tesla as a super-polluter category?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: