I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that part of the problem is over-encompassing safety rules in general, to the point that so many can be safely ignored (hello, Prop 65 in California) that it leaves people numb to the fact that some are real.
I am not sure how far I would take that line of thought, but I do think there's something to it.
I agree that wrapping everything in safety warnings is no more effective than doing without them and expecting everyone to rely on some unspecified common sense.
I am not sure how far I would take that line of thought, but I do think there's something to it.