>> This exactly mirrors a MAJOR decision-making framework taught in the Marine Corps--we actually call it the "70% solution."
This is ironic.
Taken as an entire group, people who go to fight for their respective countries are routinely lied to, rarely have the full picture of the motives of those who are sending them out to fight, and end up causing destruction which is completely disproportional to the amount of knowledge they possess.
As the saying goes, the first casualty of every war is the truth. Besides, is the 21st century war, where one side drops bombs on a technologically hapless group of people via UAVs, actually a level playing field from which you want to learn business principles?
Well, to be fair, there are all sorts of sub-level scenarios within the larger political decision to go to war that call for independent decision making.
This is ironic.
Taken as an entire group, people who go to fight for their respective countries are routinely lied to, rarely have the full picture of the motives of those who are sending them out to fight, and end up causing destruction which is completely disproportional to the amount of knowledge they possess.
As the saying goes, the first casualty of every war is the truth. Besides, is the 21st century war, where one side drops bombs on a technologically hapless group of people via UAVs, actually a level playing field from which you want to learn business principles?