Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Two things I'm seeing reading the comments:

Anyone referencing European public transportation should realize that over half the countries in Europe are smaller than the state of Iowa, and none of them save Russia & Turkey are larger than Texas. You're comparing apples to oranges.

Second, not one of the comments below mentioned the Auto lobby. If your beef is with the number of personal vehicles on the road vs. public transportation, you should probably look there first. Tell your billionaire friends to start outspending the $61 million spent in 2016 by Automotive[1] industry lobbyists (compared to the $1.4 million for Misc Transport[2]) and maybe you'll start seeing a difference.

[1] https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indusclient.php?id=M02&yea...

[2] https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D00004700...



> Anyone referencing European public transportation should realize that over half the countries in Europe are smaller than the state of Iowa, and none of them save Russia & Turkey are larger than Texas. You're comparing apples to oranges.

Completely irrelevant. Nobody is talking about providing public transit for rural Texas. The important factor is density on a local scale, not overall size.


> none of them save Russia & Turkey are larger than Texas

I don't know where you got this bizarre notion. The populations of Russia (~144m), Germany (~83m), Turkey (~80m), France (~67m), The United Kingdom (~65m), Italy (~61m), Spain (~46m), Ukraine (~43m), and Poland (~38m) are all quite a lot larger than Texas (~27m).


Physical size, not population. Public transport only works well in small areas. The higher the population density the better it works.

There are a lot of people in the US who would not be willing to live in a place with a population density high enough to support public transport.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: