> The leadership have an obligation to shareholders to break promises if it improves profitability.
Officers of a corporation have a responsibility to act in good faith for the best interest of its members. But that can include acting in long-term best interests too.
Contrary to what you may believe, no one will indict Comcast leadership for not harvest and selling info.
Also, remember "good faith". E.g. MS shareholders can't indict leadership for Windows 8 ;)
Morality has naught to do with it. Economics dictate that shareholders will dump Comcast for more profitable companies if they feel Comcast is no longer attractive enough, or if comcast is able to generate additional revenue by selling ads, then reward by buying more and driving up its price
Officers of a corporation have a responsibility to act in good faith for the best interest of its members. But that can include acting in long-term best interests too.
Contrary to what you may believe, no one will indict Comcast leadership for not harvest and selling info.
Also, remember "good faith". E.g. MS shareholders can't indict leadership for Windows 8 ;)