>>>The article is sympathetic and argues the author had innocent intentions. Perhaps that's the case, but the problem is that it would be very difficult to persuade people of that
So you support the idea of Guilty until proven innocent, combined with Guilt by Association. What a terrible combo
Most people believe it is up to government (or anyone making the claim it was not for legit use) to prove their claim, it is not up to the defendant to prove they had innocent intentions.
So you support the idea of Guilty until proven innocent, combined with Guilt by Association. What a terrible combo
Most people believe it is up to government (or anyone making the claim it was not for legit use) to prove their claim, it is not up to the defendant to prove they had innocent intentions.