Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't think the presence of the man's partner is enough to make the invitation not seem sexual in nature, is what I'm getting at.



What makes it seem sexual in nature?

Surely inviting a female employee, alone, is the unusual aspect that would make it appear suspect?


I'm not going to explain it any better than the other guy. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13970336


First things in that post:

> the individual nature of the invitation, the private nature of the venue

also:

> You don't need to see an agenda behind every invitation to recognize the agenda behind this one.

How does "that guy" know what agenda there is?

If you can't explain any better then I can't accept your argument.


You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: