> This is equivalent to asking FedEx who in a given city was shipped something from a specific address.
It is neither equivalent to nor even really analogous to it. It's more like asking a retailer that keeps such records for a list of every purchaser of a specific product.
Which, just to be clear, is something law enforcement will do in some circumstances already.
Agreed that's a much better analogy. In this case the "retailer" already maintains such records. The government isn't even asking for the list of all purchases by all individuals, just the name of who purchased a particular item.
Sure in the course of getting the answer to that question the retailer may sift through the records of all purchases, but this is data they already have.
This is hardly something to be outraged about. Title implies something much different.
It is neither equivalent to nor even really analogous to it. It's more like asking a retailer that keeps such records for a list of every purchaser of a specific product.
Which, just to be clear, is something law enforcement will do in some circumstances already.