> The article is about how they are explicitly not letting people download those security fixes.
Well... to be fair this will only affect those doing new builds, not current builds already running supported cpus.
If you're installing a new Kaby lake CPU on an OS that's outright saying it doesn't support it then it's at your own risk.
The article is about how they are explicitly not letting people download those security fixes.
> There has to be a cost in supporting these new processors.
To provide new support. There is no cost in letting the existing support that works just fine continue to run.