I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say.
What do you mean with all that? Maybe I'm being obtuse but you're just saying random words and terms from programming. How on earth is that applicable to physics? I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to propose.
Well, not OP, but that was all very understandable to me, and resonated. I'll try to explain some specific points.
>Why do this rather then define an abstract, human-evaluatable, programming language?
The syntax of math is bad for a number of reasons. Making it some big 3D thing isn't going to make that syntax more reasonable.
Math is a language that could learn a lot from programming languages, even if you don't plan on running it on a computer and dealing with all that hassle.
>Making strange squigles on a page doesn't help. Making strange greek symbols on the page doesn't help.
>Ditch the alphabet soup (and yes, even the 5th centry Greek alphabet soupe)
Math is optimized for paper. This makes it a lot less accessible these days. All these custom glyphs are a damn weird idea. Naming your variables "a" wouldn't be accepted in any other languages.
>Abstract common ideas into "functions".
Once you've abandoned the idea of single-letter variable names, it becomes easier to abstract common mathematical ideas into functions and build a great big library of those functions.
> Use logically derived variable names (even if they're 5-10 characters).
Naming your variables "a" wouldn't be accepted in any other languages, and from the outside looks like a pretty silly idea.
>Phi shouldn't mean 30 things depending on the field you're in.
The incorperation of broader programming principles and concepts that have evolved over the course of advancements in the creation of software systerms into other language-based fields including mathematics and standardization of these languages to lessen ambiguities.
Things like using variable names that make sense rather then the current single-letter + subscript limit. Using easily typable characters and combining those to create complex operations. Substituting language for obtuse symbols. Simplification of expression syntax.
I don't know best how to put it in your terms, nor what I'm missing, because these are things I take for granted being a programmer.
What do you mean with all that? Maybe I'm being obtuse but you're just saying random words and terms from programming. How on earth is that applicable to physics? I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to propose.