Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

the deal will increase its revenue outlook by around $8 million

So around a 4.5x revenue multiple, which doesn't seem bad for a business that isn't growing rapidly(?)




Since when does revenue matter? That's like selling a car dealership that does $100mm a year for $450mm, when the profit is only, say, 5% per car sold.


many acquirers focus on revenue more than profits because once ingested, the cost-side of the business can change dramatically. according to quantcast, deviantart is doing over 40MM monthly uniques. i suspect it is that reach (and not profit or revenue) that wix is actually acquiring.


My point is merely that the multiple seems healthy, but sure, if we do it on likely income instead then it's an even higher multiple that'll be well above typical acquisitions of small online communities or media sites.


I think they actually (over)paid (?) a good amount for a website that isn't growing significantly. But hey, public tech companies are held to different standards / analysed using different metrics.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: