> Even the US left its own portion of nuclear waste in the northern latitudes, such as the once secret reactor at Camp Century, in Greenland, although this is minuscule compared to what the Soviets left behind.
The pro-US bias in this article is strong. It appears to be more of the same wardrum-beating, anti-Russian propaganda that took hold of the mainstream media towards the end of the US election.
On one hand, Russia does appear to have adopted a more aggressive military stance, especially with regards to Crimea and The Ukraine.
On the other hand, the present military stance of the US looks not unlike the full-tilt, batshit-crazy world domination plans of Germany during World War II.
It appears obvious to me that our current US military leaders are not above conducting false-flag operations for the purpose of gaining public support for foreign aggression, and it would not surprise me if they were responsible for this release of Iodine-131.
Go back and read Tyler Rogoway's earlier articles. He has never beat the drum for war with Russia. Do you have specific evidence that anything he wrote is wrong?
The pro-US bias in this article is strong. It appears to be more of the same wardrum-beating, anti-Russian propaganda that took hold of the mainstream media towards the end of the US election.
On one hand, Russia does appear to have adopted a more aggressive military stance, especially with regards to Crimea and The Ukraine.
On the other hand, the present military stance of the US looks not unlike the full-tilt, batshit-crazy world domination plans of Germany during World War II.
It appears obvious to me that our current US military leaders are not above conducting false-flag operations for the purpose of gaining public support for foreign aggression, and it would not surprise me if they were responsible for this release of Iodine-131.
After all, they've done it before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Run