Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

My concern was more around split brain. If you fail over while the write master is simply unreachable, pain results.



Aurora's read replicas share the underlying storage that the primary uses, so AWS claims that there's no data loss on failover. They also claim -- and I've never heard anyone say they were wrong -- that Aurora failovers take less than a minute. So the pain should be limited to under a minute of lost writes, which most applications can handle (with an error). It can still be painful depending on the application.

See here for more info: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/faqs/#high-availability-an...




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: