Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I want to implement SAML (as a consumer).

(To be fair, it can be done without certificate chains, but it could also be done with chains.)




Yep, I saw your more general list further upthread as well. I'd argue that much of the time these things are bad and essentially a kind of unnecessary, self-inflicted cryptography. In most cases the same things can be accomplished with a secure authenticated channel, someone hanging on to the relevant state and a cryptographically secure random id. A prime example is all the 'state-carrying authenticated/encrypted session cookie' infrastructure typically built into ruby and python web frameworks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: