> *I could switch to something newer and better, but why bother?* Since it's not... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

OJFord on Dec 11, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: Ask HN: Most Sites Don't Use a CMS Like Wordpress ...

> I could switch to something newer and better, but why bother?

Since it's not maintained, personally I'd be tempted to try transitioning to something that is (with minimal change to content and structure/configuration required) to save dealing with it when you're just trying to publish new content and suddenly run up against some bug.

mbrock on Dec 11, 2016 [–]

OTOH, if it's worked fine for ten years, the risk of headaches seems lower than anything else.

And for any given static site generator, there's a pretty high risk it will be more or less unmaintained two years from now...

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact