Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sure, but then you're on the hook for what they officially do with the name, since you've sanctioned them.

Then you come to the cost of doing this while protecting yourself. Getting lawyers to draft up something appropriately restrictive is probably expensive, and still unlikely to cover all the problems you might run into, and getting the project to sign it might be hard since it's in their best interest to have a lawyer review it to make sure it doesn't give away IP, and that costs money...




>Sure, but then you're on the hook for what they officially do with the name, since you've sanctioned them.

What does the mean in real terms? If the software had a issue that causes computers to burn peoples houses down would Bethesda be at fault somehow?


The author endorses racist/sexist views, comes out for child labor, and incorporates those themes into their work, or somehow publicizes that fact in relation to your property. The details don't matter to 99% of the people out there, if an official Doom product endorsed racism, Bethesda would definitely be dealing with the fallout.


Seems a bit far fetched for me.


I'm not sure how likely it is factors all that much. When you have a hundred million to billion dollar business, why risk allowing anything even remotely like that which might harm your brand? It's much easier to just say no.


ReiserFS took a pretty bad publicity hit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: