I had such a setup when the Joplin 2011 tornado hit: http://www.ancell-ent.com/1715_Rex_Ave_127B_Joplin/images/ and I got off lightly. But the separate room my BackupPC hard drives were in was breached (see 302-2nd-bathroom-with-hole-of-unknown-origin) and those drives become fit only for Ontrack's $$$ recovery service, maybe, and one of my computers with e.g. my email was seriously damaged. The data on it was easily recovered from rsync.net's off site Denver location, who's service I love and will continue to use for my most important and "hot" data.
LTO (-4) tape had gotten capacious and cheap enough that I went back to tape (I'd outgrown DAT); if I didn't have a big sunk cost in a well working tape system and pool of tapes, which are very easy to put in e.g. a safe deposit box (they're a bit fragile, but nothing like a hard drive), I'd already be using one of S3, Glacier, or Backblaze, maybe even GCS since suddenly and irretrievably losing access to my backup data because a bot decided I was evil would not likely coincide with a total data loss at home (Google simply cannot be trusted if you're small fry like myself, as HN has been discussing as of late).
As Glacier has gotten sane enough to use without twisting your mind into a pretzel, with the new price reduction for slow retrieval I can seriously think about adding it to the mix and switching to it when my LTO-4 tape drive dies someday (e.g. ~3TiB for ~$12/month per my quick calculation just now), instead of buying another tape drive.
LTO (-4) tape had gotten capacious and cheap enough that I went back to tape (I'd outgrown DAT); if I didn't have a big sunk cost in a well working tape system and pool of tapes, which are very easy to put in e.g. a safe deposit box (they're a bit fragile, but nothing like a hard drive), I'd already be using one of S3, Glacier, or Backblaze, maybe even GCS since suddenly and irretrievably losing access to my backup data because a bot decided I was evil would not likely coincide with a total data loss at home (Google simply cannot be trusted if you're small fry like myself, as HN has been discussing as of late).
As Glacier has gotten sane enough to use without twisting your mind into a pretzel, with the new price reduction for slow retrieval I can seriously think about adding it to the mix and switching to it when my LTO-4 tape drive dies someday (e.g. ~3TiB for ~$12/month per my quick calculation just now), instead of buying another tape drive.