Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We currently have the 80 cm Spitzer telescope in space that covers the same wavelength range, and the 3.5 m Herschel telescope also recently finished its mission at slightly longer wavelengths. So really to make breakthroughs in science to justify the cost of a space mission, we need the full 6.5 m telescope.



There is also SOFIA [1] (2.5m telescope on an airplane), which can do certain far-IR things (mid-IR as well iirc). For the VLT (8m ground-based telescopes) there is also VISIR [2] which is an mid-IR imager/spectrometer (and uses the same detector chip as one of the JWST instruments iirc).

[1] https://www.sofia.usra.edu/ [2] http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/paranal/instruments/visir....


Oh yeah, those do cover the same wavelength range. The atmosphere of the Earth absorbs a lot of the light and has a strong thermal background though. The sensitivity of JWST is orders of magnitude better than ground/airborne observatories [1], so things that JWST want to do will be basically impossible from the ground.

[1] http://ecuip.lib.uchicago.edu/multiwavelength-astronomy/imag...


Oh I am perfectly aware. It's just not all projects require JWST-level sensitivity and they are somewhat less known.

Also I think SOFIA in visitor-mode is hard to beat when it comes to the coolness-factor.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: