> Your idea that men and Jews are equivalently oppressed
Which is not, in fact, what I said. Or what I believe. But why let facts interfere with a good flamewar?
> you seem to believe it is invalid to point out that these situations are different and require different responses
You're missing my point. Which is explained in simple English FFS.
> The evidence you provide is an overtly anti-Semitic subreddit
Uh... no. You don't seem to be able to understand rhetoric or analogy.
No one in that subreddit advocates anti-semitism. Instead, they re-write hateful articles to show that they have the same tone and style as anti-semitic articles. And that both are wrong.
Your interpretation of these analogies is that the people are actually advocating the opinions they're mocking.
Which (again) entirely misses the point. Depressingly so.
> I see a world where the "oppression" of men takes the form of a handful of anecdotes of people saying mean things
Like advocating for the genocide of men? Which isn't entirely saying "mean things".
> The willful non-recognition that these are different types of issues that require different responses is naked bigotry.
I think your hostility comes from a point of view which prevents you from understanding what I've written.
I've tried to make it as clear as I can. Genocide is bad. Advocating for genocide is bad.
Anyone should be able to understand that.
Your point is that advocating for the genocide of some people isn't really that bad... because jewish people had it worse.
If you can't understand the immorality of such a statement, I have little more to say. If the only way you can defend such actions is to label me an anti-semite, well, that's your delusion. You're welcome to it.
Which is not, in fact, what I said. Or what I believe. But why let facts interfere with a good flamewar?
> you seem to believe it is invalid to point out that these situations are different and require different responses
You're missing my point. Which is explained in simple English FFS.
> The evidence you provide is an overtly anti-Semitic subreddit
Uh... no. You don't seem to be able to understand rhetoric or analogy.
No one in that subreddit advocates anti-semitism. Instead, they re-write hateful articles to show that they have the same tone and style as anti-semitic articles. And that both are wrong.
Your interpretation of these analogies is that the people are actually advocating the opinions they're mocking.
Which (again) entirely misses the point. Depressingly so.
> I see a world where the "oppression" of men takes the form of a handful of anecdotes of people saying mean things
Like advocating for the genocide of men? Which isn't entirely saying "mean things".
> The willful non-recognition that these are different types of issues that require different responses is naked bigotry.
I think your hostility comes from a point of view which prevents you from understanding what I've written.
I've tried to make it as clear as I can. Genocide is bad. Advocating for genocide is bad.
Anyone should be able to understand that.
Your point is that advocating for the genocide of some people isn't really that bad... because jewish people had it worse.
If you can't understand the immorality of such a statement, I have little more to say. If the only way you can defend such actions is to label me an anti-semite, well, that's your delusion. You're welcome to it.