Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But we're using a lot of the crust. No one will be mining under Atlanta. There are plenty of places we aren't using, but the crust is also thick. A mile down sounds really deep, much less 20 miles.

I mostly agree with you, but it might wind up easier to nab an asteroid than dig a mile under the ocean.




"But we're using a lot of the crust."

39% of the surface area is used by agriculture, and 3% by urban areas. That excludes oceans & Antartica. Including those, the number drops to less than 10%.

Mining takes up less than 0.05% of the surface area of the earth.

I think we're good.


Because it's easy. Digging a hole even a mile deep is hard. It might be worth it, but again, it might be easier to just grab an asteroid.


Is Atlanta rich in rare earth minerals or something, or are you just using a random city as an example? I'm aware of various granite mines around the city (such as where they filmed Walking Dead and Stranger Things), but I wouldn't have imagined Georgia to have disproportionately more minerals than other states in the Southeast.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: