Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Are you kidding? Come on. Both campaigns are turning out women claiming to have been abused years in the past. Even though some of them may have in fact been, it's turning into a circus, a competition of who can turn out the most or worst victims. These are not investigations, these are media circuses. How can you possibly take it seriously a few weeks before the election?

Did you see the Project Veritas stuff? You know, where the Democratic campaign staffers confess to having hired mentally ill people to commit acts of violence at Trump rallies? And to hiring people to vote out-of-state, specifically using their own cars or rentals to avoid the obvious concern that would be generated by busing them in?

So think about this: if you have at least one of the campaigns having confessed to criminal electioneering, why would you believe anything they say? Why would you believe anyone they bring forward to slander the opposing candidate?

I don't support any such boasts. I support healthy skepticism. NBC didn't have any problem with Trump's conduct when he was a TV star raking in millions for them, but now that he's opposing Dear Leader, the evidence must be brought forward.

And you try to turn this around and make it about me? You're clearly not interested in truth of any kind.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: