Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Way simpler: from inside out, read any subpart of the type as an expression. (Arrays have precedence over pointers, as usual.) The type that remains is that expression's type. So e.g. given the type:

    const char *foo[][50]
the following expressions have the following types:

     foo       -> const char *[][50]
     foo[0]    -> const char *  [50]
     foo[0][0] -> const char *
    *foo[0][0] -> const char
Another example:

    int (*const bar)[restrict]
    
      bar     -> int (*const)[restrict]
     *bar     -> int         [restrict]
    (*bar)[0] -> int
One more:

    int (*(*f)(int))(void)
    
        f        -> int (*(*)(int))(void)
      (*f)       -> int (*   (int))(void)
      (*f)(0)    -> int (*        )(void)
     *(*f)(0)    -> int            (void)
    (*(*f)(0))() -> int
(In this case, the last expression is more readily written as f(0)(), since pointers to functions and functions are called using the same syntax.)



What happened to the const in the second example?


The pointer itself is const; not what it points to.

    bar  -> const pointer to mutable array of ints
    *bar -> mutable array of ints
And const pointers are dereferenced with * , not (* const), so the rule needs an exception for const pointers (as well as volatile pointers).


That const applies only to the bar symbol itself, not to anything it points to. So once bar is dereferenced, the const doesn't matter. The beauty of this method is that it predicts that correctly without having to think about it.


Yeah, I think they confused

  const *
with

  * const


Nope, * const means that the identifier (i.e. thing to the right of the star) is const. That is, in this example, the symbol "bar" is const, not anything that it points to. So once you dereference it, the const no longer matters.


You're right, I got confused. const is read as "the thing to the right of me is const". const * means const pointer, * const means pointer to const.


Vice versa. Const pointer:

    int *const p;
Pointer to const value:

    const int *p
    int const *p
>const is read as "the thing to the right of me is const"

const is one of storage classes and is read at its order, not just "to the right".


Wow. I literally was staring at my test case when I wrote it and I _still_ got it wrong. I think I need to get some more sleep...


This would make a great CLI tool!




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: