Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think you are missing the main thrust of the book. He is not trying to convince you that em-based AI is the likely future. He chose the less examined possibility as a starting point, but the main part of the book is to enumerate the predictions that flow from that premise.

This is interesting and worth examining even if the premise is wrong. Sometimes examining a familiar topic in unfamiliar terrain yields new insights.




"False premise" is a logical fallacy, not a virtue.


A false premise isn't a logical fallacy. Arguments can be logically valid yet wrong, and vice versa.


Right, and taking a premise you believe to be false and mapping out its consequences has a long and noble history; e.g., non-Euclidean geometry.


Okay then...if not a logical fallacy, then just a fallacy ("mistaken belief").

The sort of prognostication that would do poorly on a debate team, because its premises are unsound.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: