This is basically a copy and paste of your previous post https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=ting_bu_dung without even bothering to correct the most glaring error pointed out by others. I say this is pretty disrespectful to users who are interested in real discussions.
my last comment didn't get any good response; one wanted a clarification which was easily googleable. the other one about hyperinflation being supply driven made no sense (incorrect definition of hyperinflation), so I didn't bother responding.
how about you? do you have any response about the content, or is it more meta-critique?
"europe and China both likely reject China's market economy status"
Did you even read what you posted? The above does not make any sense and you repeated it here without any correction anyway.
Googling or not you don't seem to realize that China is not currently recognized as a market economy by both Europe and US per China's WTO accession agreement. That particular clause is going to sunset this year. After the sunset if Europe and US follow the WTO rules they will no longer be able to use "substitute country" in determining fair prices in anti-dumping investigations. This is a positive for China. Even if Europe and US refuse to change it is still just status quo, or in your words, "non-event".
The other commenter's critique on your hyperinflation claim is entirely valid. Calling him incorrect without giving your "correct" definition does not make it so.
Also self-plagiarism is a thing. Sure this is only an internet forum but unless you are hell bent on propaganda please refrain from copying yourself verbatim without at least making a reference to your previous posts so people don't waste time repeatedly refuting your identical claims.
