As far as I can see:
- 6a4bf69 has not been reverted
- d4a97c5 has been reverted in 8050b2d
- 5f7da05 has been reverted in ccc183d (webmin)
- cf5e9d3 has been reverted in 792a996 (webmin)
- c6634da has not been reverted, he is still listed in debian/copyright.
- 82f8600 has not been reverted (was extended in f24650f)
- 7f8efa8 has not been reverted
- e4f4889 has not been reverted
So, out of 8 commits, 3 have been reverted. The 2 webmin reverts were followed by deletion of the whole webmin file the same day (5785901).
I don't see how three reverts are "a flood of notification e-mails" or that "The lead developer had reverted every single commit I had made."
But I agree that the commit messages of those reverts should have contained a reason.
Obviously something went wrong. But I don't have enough information to call it a dick move.
As far as I can see:
- 6a4bf69 has not been reverted
- d4a97c5 has been reverted in 8050b2d
- 5f7da05 has been reverted in ccc183d (webmin)
- cf5e9d3 has been reverted in 792a996 (webmin)
- c6634da has not been reverted, he is still listed in debian/copyright.
- 82f8600 has not been reverted (was extended in f24650f)
- 7f8efa8 has not been reverted
- e4f4889 has not been reverted
So, out of 8 commits, 3 have been reverted. The 2 webmin reverts were followed by deletion of the whole webmin file the same day (5785901).
I don't see how three reverts are "a flood of notification e-mails" or that "The lead developer had reverted every single commit I had made."
But I agree that the commit messages of those reverts should have contained a reason.
Obviously something went wrong. But I don't have enough information to call it a dick move.