> The tax is VAT and recent changes on electronic services had exactly the goal you mentioned in mind.
Those changes on electronic services make similarly little sense, as they require a service to apply taxes in the jurisdiction of the consumer rather than in the jurisdiction of the business. (And such regulations disadvantage EU companies, as a non-EU company with no legal nexus in the EU has no obligation to charge such taxes.)
By definition, a company or individual has no legal obligation to care about laws outside their jurisdiction. The EU can say anything it likes about what companies "must" do, but they have no jurisdiction over non-EU companies. (Unless their own country enters into some kind of mutual enforcement agreement, or unless they ship a physical item that has to go through EU customs.)
I think you've missed the point of the comment you replied to. You have no obligation to follow the laws (taxation or otherwise) of a country/territory that has no jurisdiction over you (and no other power of enforcement, such as customs for physical products).
Providing an electronic service to everyone in the world does not make you subject to the laws of every country in the world, as much as those countries might wish otherwise.
Those changes on electronic services make similarly little sense, as they require a service to apply taxes in the jurisdiction of the consumer rather than in the jurisdiction of the business. (And such regulations disadvantage EU companies, as a non-EU company with no legal nexus in the EU has no obligation to charge such taxes.)