Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What's the rationale behind forcing people to use an editor (especially a specific editor for a single language)?


To get stubborn people to try new tools for a change.

Of course their goal is conformity, easier management (e.g. everybody gets the same linters, code formatters, etc), but the above is a nice side benefit too.

There are tons of people using some antiquated editor and swearing by it, that get amazed when they are forced (by a job) to use a modern IDE and see what it can do for them.

And I'm not talking about Emacs etc -- which can do a lot if you set it up right, I talk about people coding e.g. Java with Slickedit or whatever. Heck even Vim users are sometimes surprised of the convenience (and turn-key use) of embedded debugger, build system, actual AST-based auto-completion, refactoring tools, etc.

Because when we code, actually editing text is the least of our worries, and yet this is what most simple "programming editors" focus on -- it's not like we're building huge ASCII art paintings...


They can use anything as Long as the code meets the requirements. But having one official tool makes it easy to work together (in our case).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: