This is a long 1995 congress hearing video that I doubt many people have time and patience to sit through. But if you fast forward to the debate between D.E. Shaw and Seymour Papert/Alan Kay, you will find out 20 years later, the hardware progress is almost exactly as Shaw had predicted, on the other hand, we are far from the vision of Seymour Papert and Alan Kay.
At least, I think we have hit the point where a 5 year life cycle for a $1000 computer is reasonable.
On the other hand there's still a lot of teaching where a single person sits in front and tries to broadcast knowledge to a group of students, which to me seems absurd. The fact that the most obvious difference between schools now and 30 years ago is that whiteboards, powerpoint, and flatscreens have replaced blackboards, overhead projectors, and film projectors was perhaps predictable, but seems wasteful.
Thanks for the observation on the 5 year life cycle.
But if we think of the "education" in 5-year stages: the first is elementary school, the second is middle and high school, the third is college, the fouth is grad school.
So the the "life-long" educational computer budget for each student is $4000.
Technology In Education The committee examined technological advances in education. OCTOBER 12, 1995
Alan Brown Superintendent Public Schools
Chris Dede Professor George Mason University
Jeffrey Joseph Vice President U.S. Chamber of Commerce->Domestic Policy
Alan Kay Fellow Apple Computer->Learning Concepts
Cheryl Lemke Associate Superintendent Illinois->Board of Education
Edward McCracken President and CEO Silicon Graphics
Deborah McGriff Senior Vice President Edison Project
Robert W. Mendenhall Vice President IBM->K-12 Industry Division
Seymour Papert Professor Massachusetts Institute of Technology->Technology
David Shaw Chief Executive Officer Shaw Investment Company
Pat Wright Vice President TCI Educational Technologies