Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

`const int * ` and `int const * ` are semantically identical, ie `const int const * ` is a duplicate declaration.



Opps, I'll update my post. Looks like peeyek had already pointed out that the pointer isn't const anyway.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: