No, facts are facts. And the fact is that every prediction that has been made has underestimated the coming change. If I predict the DJIA will rise 50 pts every day next week, and it really goes up 100 pts, am I wrong? Sure, but not the way you think.
Don't care about karma, I care about my career. I've seen several careers short circuited because they didn't tow the complete liberal orthodox line. Welcome to SF.
So, first, it's "toe the line," and second, toeing the line means stretching outside the defined limit. You may want to edit your post to make a coherent statement.
Nah, it's just that people generally don't like to work with someone who claims "Scientists are wrong," and when asked how he/she knows it, answers "Well, they've been wrong before!"
Because who wants to argue with such a person in a design meeting?
No one is saying that but at least, unlike you, scientists have attempted to make a case (as have several other people on this thread). I'm inclined to go with the people who've studied this subject, made arguments, were peer reviewed at least by each other, even with the reality of their human failings and biases.
