Saw that movie with a large group of ThinkingMachines employees. We'd rented out the theater for one of the first showings, since they'd used a ThinkingMachine CM-5 supercomputer instead of a Cray because Cray wouldn't loan them one of theirs.

Anyway that line got a huge reaction of cheering and applause, bigger than any other during the movie.

That particular example seems so strange. The first half of the movie seems believable: long debug/compile times, never shut down the mainframe, disgruntled employee ineptly tries corporate espionage. Then we get that atrocity of a file explorer.

That scene did seem out of place, and I'm not sure how useful a 3D file explorer is, but fsn was a real (experimental) product for IRIX systems.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fsn

edit: fsn is lowercase

Never forget the 90's love for 3d actually went this far beyond the practical.

Perhaps culminating with psDoom, which allowed you to kill processes by shooting them in an FPS.

It could be they were intentionally trying to make the IT look bad.

From what I remember about the book, the dinosaur motion-tracking system was programmed to only find N dinosaurs each day because there was no reason for there to be more dinosaurs. It's why the dinos were able to breed undetected, because even though they were being picked up, the system only looked for N dinosaurs.

> It could be they were intentionally trying to make the IT look bad.

Or... Film is a visual medium, and so things have to look gee-wizy, because light grey text on a little black window looks incredibly boring. Have you you not seen a movie featuring computers in the last 35 years? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6gGUR3Ga4

Filmmakers can probably get away with light grey text on a black window much easier now, because it's now so far from most filmgoers' everyday experience of computing. Whereas in the time of Jurassic Park, the DOS command line was not at all exotic.