I think you're assuming that paying for damage is equivalent to correcting it, w... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

nihonde on April 2, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: The Secret Money Behind ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’

I think you're assuming that paying for damage is equivalent to correcting it, which is a seriously broken assumption.

yongjik on April 2, 2016 [–]

"Paying for damage" seems working pretty well for national parks. Besides, the choice right now is not between paying and correcting, but between paying and not paying.

Perfect is the enemy of better.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact